The Grand Valley Canals Double Message

The beautiful banks of the Grand Valley Canals have beckoned locals for recreation for generations.

The beautiful banks of the Grand Valley Canals have beckoned locals for recreation for generations.

Updated September 8, 2016 – Author’s note: Further highlighting the ridiculousness of keeping the area’s canal banks off limits to non-motorized public recreation, on September 5, 2016, The Daily Sentinel published a front page story about the possibility of opening up the Orchard Mesa canal banks to public recreational use. The story quoted former Colorado State Representative Tim Foster, now President of Colorado Mesa University, who called landowners’ claims that they fear legal liability from opening the canals to public recreation a “red herring.” Here’s the quote:

[Colorado Mesa University President] Tim Foster…served as a Colorado state representative between 1988 and 1996 and helped carry a bill in the early 1990s that would transfer liability of canal banks to the state, paving the way to combine trails with canals. The law was passed to help complete the current High Line Canal Trail in Denver that spans more than 70 miles, though that ditch doesn’t usually contain much water.

“The bill gave them protections from liability,” Foster said. “The liability argument is a complete red herring. Me and Tillie (Bishop) carried it, and it gives them immunity. At the end of the day, these guys got stuck on not letting anybody on the canals.”

 

Grand Junction, Colorado area citizens can often be seen walking dogs, running, biking and even cross-country skiing on the beautiful banks of the Grand Valley’s irrigation canals. The maintenance roads along the canals offer expansive vistas, blissful quiet and a feeling of safety for recreators because of the absence of motor vehicles. Newer subdivisions across the valley even have concrete pathways leading straight up onto the canal banks, beckoning residents to take peaceful walks there.

But at the same time signs posted along the canal roads warn that they are “No Trespassing” zones.

So, which is it?

Are the canal roads off limits, or is it okay for the public to walk, run or bike on them?

Both. And neither.

A Tradition of Trespass

People have trespassed on the Grand Valley’s canal banks for generations, since the canals were built 100 years ago. During that time the “no trespassing” rule has almost never been enforced. Mesa County Sheriff Stan Hilkey says not one single case of canal road trespassing has ever been prosecuted in the valley in the 28 years he’s been with the Sheriff Department. “Maybe someone has gotten a ticket,” said Hilkey, but basically it’s “the lowest priority misdemeanor there is.”

In law enforcement terms, that means if someone calls 911 and reports a canal-bank trespassing, they probably shouldn’t expect a car to respond.

Local subdivisions have sidewalks that lead between houses right onto the banks of the canals

“No Trespassing?” Grand Junction subdivisions have sidewalks between houses that lead right up and onto the canal banks

The canals and their associated roads and facilities are owned by the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (“Reclamation” or “BuRec”), which is amenable to opening up the canal banks to non-motorized public recreation. Some of the canals run across private property, and in those cases the U.S. government (BuRec) holds easements or rights-of-way for canal maintenance and operation. In an August 13, 2013 letter to Christian Reece, Chair of the Grand Junction Planning Commission (pdf), Ed Warner, Area Manager of BuRec’s Grand Junction Office wrote,

“Reclamation is open to trail development on or near Reclamation project lands if such development does not interfere with the operation and maintenance of the water project and does not increase liability to its managing entities and the United States [government]. In addition, Reclamation will require the concurrence of the [Grand Valley Water Users] Association and the [Orchard Mesa Irrigation] District before we will consider any trail on any Reclamation [Operations and Maintenance] road.”

If the canal banks were opened to the public, BuRec says, they would want some other legal entity, like the City, the County or a trail association, to assume the responsibility and cost for operation and maintenance of the trails, and for enforcing law and order on them. That makes sense because BuRec isn’t in the business of operating trails. BuRec also wants written consent from their contract irrigation companies and the underlying private land owners along the canals.

When asked why there haven’t been any cases of trespassing prosecuted on the canal banks, Kathleen Ozga of BuRec said that her agency is mainly concerned about damage to the canal and irrigation facilities. If there is no damage, they aren’t concerned about people on the canal banks. She also said that prosecution of trespassing is left to the underlying private landowners along the canal routes.

Prosecuting Canal Road Trespass Isn’t Easy

"NO Trespassing" signs are seen all along the canal routes, but some area roads lead right up and onto the canal banks

“NO Trespassing – Violators will be Prosecuted” signs are posted all along the canal routes

According to Sheriff Hilkey, to prosecute a trespass, a private landowner must be able to identify a trespasser by name, and prove the trespass occurred.

That’s not easy.

A landowner could take a time-and-date-stamped photo of someone walking on their section of the canal bank, for example, but they’d have to get the trespasser’s name — information a trespasser is unlikely to give up. Upon seeing an alleged trespasser, a landowner could call 911, but if there are any crimes at all of higher priority going on in town, due to the extreme low priority of canal bank trespassing calls, a car probably won’t respond. Also, because it takes only seconds for a walker, biker or runner to finish crossing a discrete piece of private land, there’s little time for a landowner to document the alleged “crime.” Another consideration is the time a landowner must invest in prosecuting an alleged trespass. He or she would have to drive down to the Sheriff’s office to file a report, make an official statement and/or eventually appear as a witness.

Given the high bar of evidence to press charges, and since trespassing on the canal roads is an act that essentially leaves no evidence other than footprints, it’s no wonder that prosecution of this “crime” has long been non-existent.

Private Landowners Fret Unnecessarily

As more community-minded people and younger, more active generations move into our area, more area residents than ever are looking at the canal roads and starting to ask why these high-potential recreational gems aren’t officially open to the public. Whenever the subject of opening up the canal banks to non-motorized public recreation comes to the fore, as it does with increasing frequency in Mesa County, private landowners along the canals invariably say their biggest worry is the legal liability they would face for people who might get hurt on their land.

But these fears are unfounded.

In 1970, the state legislature enacted the Colorado Recreational Use Statute specifically to encourage rural land owners to make their land available for recreational purposes. This law sharply limits landowners’ liability towards people who recreate on their land. The law says that if a land owner allows the general public onto their land for recreational purposes without charge, the owner is not liable for injury suffered by a recreational user. Landowners are only liable for injury if they intentionally or maliciously injure someone who uses their land, for example by setting up a trip-wire designed to shoot someone who triggers it by walking across their land. In enacting this statute, the legislature took the rare further step of requiring that if a landowner is ever sued by a recreational user and the landowner prevails, the recreational user is required to pay the landowner’s attorneys fees and other related court costs. The statute provides extra protection to landowners by stating specifically that water is not an attractive nuisance. What more could possibly be done to protect landowners from liability? Not much.

So What to Do?

Some subdivision paths lead right up to the canal banks but have "No Trespassing" signs and concrete barriers that can be stepped over or around fairly easily.

Sidewalks lead right up to the canal banks but have “No Trespassing” signs and big concrete barriers that can be stepped around easily.

Basically, what stands between the indefinite perpetuation of what are essentially fake “no trespassing” zones and turning the main canal roads into a fabulous recreational asset are the irrigation companies, which contract with BuRec to operate the canals, and the few private landowners along the canals who keep bucking efforts to officially open the canal roads up to the public.

People who want to recreate on the canals can seek permission from individual landowners to walk, run, bike or ski on their canal banks. Who owns the land along the canals is discoverable, and it’s public record. People with an Internet connection can go to emap.mesacounty.us — the county assessor’s map — to find out who owns the parcels along various sections of the canals. Once on the assessor’s map, use your cursor to drag the map to your area of interest and then zoom in on the parcels of interest. On the “Selection Tools” menu, click on the exclamation point and then click on any parcel. A new window pops open showing who owns that parcel, their contact information (including their city of residence, as often parcels are owned by people who live out of town), a description of the parcel and how it’s used (e.g., residential or agricultural) and the property tax the owners pay on the parcel. People can use the contact information to ask formal permission to pass across the land, or find out if the owners live out of the area.

You can also write to the various irrigation companies (Grand Valley Irrigation or Orchard Mesa Irrigation), or just the ones near your part of town, and express your desire that they open up their canal banks to public, non-motorized recreation. You can find all of the local irrigation companies’ contact information at irrigationprovidersgv.org.

In the mean time continue to note the longstanding presence of “No Trespassing” signage and act accordingly, but you also may want to practice walking, biking, skiing or running real fast.

3 comments for “The Grand Valley Canals Double Message

  1. Anne Landman
    September 10, 2016 at 9:43 pm

    Many other communities across the country have opened their canal banks for public, non-motorized recreation. It’s nothing new, and it has been done before many times in many places with great success. We can certainly do it here, too.

  2. Frederick G. Aldrich
    September 10, 2016 at 5:35 pm

    Ms. Landman simply does not know what she is blogging about. The City of Grand Junction was the first to institutionalize promotion of public trails on canals following federal multi-modal transportation legislation in the 1990s followed by a study from a Boulder consultant. Every irrigation entity charged with the operation, maintenance and safety of the canals vigorously objected yet the City pressed ahead dismissing the operators concerns even though not one City official had the slightest idea of how to operate a canal. Trails advocates posture the controversy as the canal operators’ cynical and unenlightened opposition to the public interest solely out of liability concerns. Nothing is further from the truth. Trails advocates do not know the first thing about canal operations and public safety and, quite frankly, don’t care. Their response to public safety concerns is the Colorado Recreational Use Statute that they think exempts canal companies from liability. An exemption from liability, even if it existed, won’t bring back the children (and adults) who drown in the canals. And the statute is so shot full of exceptions that any attorney could drive a truck through them. The surge in public use following the City’s promotion of trails on canals is no small matter and well-documented. The canals were built over 100 years ago to deliver raw, river water for agriculture-not to provide recreation to “enlightened” trails advocates. Ms. Landman should respect the canal companies’ policies and the rights of private property owners and withdraw her (wink, wink) suggestion that trespassers learn to run “real fast.”

  3. Kim
    September 9, 2016 at 12:17 pm

    Well it is often private property that we pay high taxes for and and are already having to deal with the uncaring canal operators who have been less than respectful towards the owners of the property they have access to. If you think 4-wheelers, dirt bikes and go carts will stay off -think again. Then you have 8 year olds wildly running down the canal road ready to dump into the canal and drown. No thanks!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *